Skip to Content

Another Palestinian Candidate and a Powerful Jewish View of the Holocaust

November 30, 2004

Click here to let your friends know about JPN.

Jewish Voice for Peace needs your support. We are hard at work trying to expand our reach, to create JVP chapters around the country, to escalate our educational and media services like JPN and pushing forward with our Caterpillar Campaign. We can only do all of this with your help. Click here to donate now and help keep services like Jewish Peace News coming to you.

With the death of Yasir Arafat, there have been many articles about him. Click here for JVP's quick review of Arafat's life.

The views expressed here are those of the editors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Jewish Voice for Peace.

Today's Contents:

Reform candidate enters PA race (BBC) Mustafa Barghouti throws his hat in the ring

The Wrath of the Jews (Znet) Liat Weingart on how Holocaust manipulation hurts us all and promotes militarism

 

[JPN Commentary: Dr. Mustafa Barghouti, founder and leader of al-Mubadara, the Palestinian National Initiative has declared his candidacy for Palestinian president. According to this BBC report, he is a distant second to Mahmoud Abbas (Abu Mazen) in polls.

Barghouti should not be confused with Marwan Barghouti, who is currently imprisoned in an Israeli jail. Marwan, who is extremely popular on the Palestinian street, declared he would not run and threw his support behind Abbas. This was a decisive factor in the widespread belief that Abbas will easily win the election.

But Mustafa Barghouti is a long-time advocate for civil society within the Palestinian territories and for clear negotiations with strong stances in dealings with Israel. While many media outlets have, absurdly, described someone like Mohammed Dahlan as a "reformer", Barghouti has been campaigning for real, fundamental reforms and democratization of Palestinian government for years. He does not have Abbas' experience in major leadership, or in the more violent aspects that characterized the PLO in the 1970s. But he has been a voice of moral clarity and political sensibility and has won the respect of many Palestinians over the years.

While it seems that Abbas' election is a foregone conclusion, his actions will be watched very closely by many. Today, for example he ordered, at Israel's behest, Palestinian media to refrain from "incitement". This won't have a major impact for most Palestinians as the edict deals only with state media, which is not very popular among Palestinians who tend more toward the various foreign Arab satellite stations. Still, although Israel has tried not to appear to supportive of Abbas for fear of hurting his chances, gestures like this toward Israel could hurt Abbas' standing in the eyes of many Palestinians who are already somewhat skeptical of him.

While Barghouti is unlikely to win this election, he would do well to keep growing his presence on the Palestinian political scene. The sort of democratization that he advocates and the clear negotiating stances with Israel, while maintaining a clear goal of ending the occupation, that he advocates are very much what the Palestinian people need at this time. – MP]

Reform candidate enters PA race

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4052091.stm

Palestinian democracy and human rights activist Mustafa Barghouti has joined the race to replace the late Yasser Arafat as Palestinian president.

Polls suggest that Mr Barghouti, 50, is in second place behind frontrunner Mahmoud Abbas, who represents the ruling Fatah party.

"I will demand total reform, fight any form of corruption, mismanagement, and consolidate the rule of law," he said.

Elections for the Palestinian Authority presidency are due on 9 January, 2005.

Mr Abbas, widely known as Abu Mazen, received a boost in his campaign when the al-Aqsa Martyrs' Brigades - the armed wing of Fatah - announced it would back his candidacy.

Another member of the Barghouti clan, Fatah leader in the West Bank Marwan Barghouti - who has been jailed on terrorism charges by Israel - announced on Friday he would not run in the presidential election and urged supporters to back Mr Abbas.

'Historic moment'

Mustafa Barghouti, who will run as an independent, is the founder of the reformist Palestinian National Initiative.

He said he wanted to make the fight against governmental corruption one of the main platforms of his campaign.

His policies include creation of a Palestinian state with Jerusalem as its capital, the right of return for refugees and the establishment of a democratic political system.

He favours an immediate resumption of peace talks with Israel and peaceful resistance to the Israeli occupation

"This is a historic moment in the life of the Palestinians, to prove to the world that we deserve our status as an independent Palestinian people and a free people in our independent state," Mr Barghouti said.

A poll by the State Information Service in Gaza indicated Mr Abbas had 41% of the vote while Mr Barghouti had 20%.

'Not tough enough'

Mr Abbas was nominated to run as Fatah's only candidate at a Fatah Revolutionary Council meeting in the West Bank city of Ramallah on Thursday.

The al-Aqsa Martyrs' Brigades - which are divided into several factions - came together to issue the joint statement in support of Mr Abbas on Sunday.

Mr Abbas has been an outspoken opponent of the armed Palestinian uprising to which the al-Aqsa Brigades have been totally committed - and some militants fear that he will not be tough enough in negotiations with the Israelis, BBC correspondent Alan Johnston says.

But the militants of al-Aqsa will watch Mr Abbas closely and if they were to decide that he was giving too much away to the Israelis, he could face serious opposition from the militants which might split the Fatah movement badly, our correspondent says.

Mr Abbas served as prime minister in 2003 and has already replaced Arafat as Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO) chairman.

Other possible independent candidates include political science professor Abdel Sattar Qassem, journalist Majda al-Batch and billionaire businessman Munib al-Masri.

The militant Islamic movements Hamas and Islamic Jihad are boycotting the campaign because of their opposition to the creation of the Palestinian Authority in the Oslo peace accords.


[JPN Commentary: In a hard-hitting commentary, Liat Weingart, Co-Director of Jewish Voice for Peace, turns the cynical manipulation of Holocaust history to serve militaristic ends on its head. Beginning with her visceral reaction to a venomous expression of hatred toward Palestinians, Weingart explores how the manipulation of Holocaust history not only serves to support American policies that block hope for peace in Israel and Palestine, but also denies the very real effects the Holocaust continues to have to this day on Jews and other groups.

Weingart does us all a service by giving us a glimpse of how shallow the common Holocaust narrative really is. She picks up on themes that were explored in Peter Novick's excellent work, "The Holocaust in American Life" and applies them to her real life experience.

The manipulation of the Holocaust has led many to try to approach the current Jewish community and the conflict between Israel and the Palestinians by trying to remove the Holocaust from the discussion. Weingart demonstrates that a better way might well be to supplant Holocaust manipulation with a truer understanding of the Holocaust. Because if there is one thing the Holocaust should have taught us all it is that attempting to secure your own people through nothing but force and the oppression of others, as the Nazis did, brings doom upon your own people, your victims and on generations to come in ways that cannot be predicted. It's a lesson that ought to be applied today in the Occupied Territories, Iraq, Haiti, Colombia, the Ivory Coast, Chechnya and many other places around the world. – MP]

The Wrath of the Jews

by Liat Weingart

http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?SectionID=30&ItemID=6757

I'm in the living room of a family friend. The subject changes from yoga to Israel-Palestine, and I tell her that I think Americans need to change their foreign policy towards Israel. She says, "in what way, so that the Arabs will throw the Jews into the sea?" It takes four minutes of back and forth for the conversation to degenerate. She finally says, "Look, what I have to say isn't pretty, but I'm not afraid. I'm going to say it anyways. The Palestinians are nothing but vermin. They make trouble in every country they live in. Even the other Arab countries don't want them."

I take a deep breath. Then I realize, I've heard that sentence before, only with "Jews" instead of "Palestinians." "Jews are vermin. They make trouble in every country they live in." I've heard that before. And it's breaking my heart that it's coming out of her mouth.

Earlier in the evening, we were sitting at dinner, and I asked her about why she left Poland. She said that anti-Semitism in Poland was extremely severe when she was growing up. She says that there was an outburst of anti-Semitism in the mid-sixties, and especially after the June 1967 War. Her husband, also a Polish Jew, looks up from his food and says abruptly, "Hey, why are you talking about this? Please change the subject."

At dinner, everyone is more than willing to oblige with their Israeli army stories, about how the Arabs want to throw the Jews in to the sea, but no one wants to go there when it comes to talking about how they were hurt by anti-Semitism. My mother has told me only a few stories of what it was like for her to grow up as a Jew in the Soviet Union. The most famous is how she took a broom to the head of a guy in school who persistently called her a "dirty Jew." It's the story with a happy ending. Justice was done. Less discussed is the story about how her father, a man who smuggled Jews out of the USSR and into Israel, was arrested by the KGB and sent to prison for eight years. Or how she was taken out of class every day for years and interrogated about her parents' "political activity."

There's a lot of crying and screaming to do. And there ain't a whole lot of room for it. Despite the enormity of the Holocaust Museum in Washington and various monuments to the Holocaust in the US, when you really get down to it, listening to Jews cry about how their families were annihilated, how they were beaten and targeted, is not a favorite American past-time. Neither, for that matter, is it terribly exciting for white folks to listen to Blacks cry about the legacy of slavery, economic exploitation, and racism. Or for straight people to listen to GLBTQT folks cry about what it feels like to have to lie about your identity to survive, to live in existential terror.

The Holocaust Museum in Washington is the largest in the world and in the center of Washington, DC. Many of us think that Americans have heard more than enough about Jewish suffering. But the truth is that the Holocaust Museum and other forms of official recognition of Jewish suffering haven't addressed anti-Jewish oppression at all. It's hardly accidental. After all, though the United States was created through the genocide of Native Americans, there is no museum to commemorate their genocide in the center of our nation's capitol, built on a federal land grant. The reason is simple – justice for Native Americans runs counter to the interests of the American ruling elite, whose wealth and power is built upon the legacy of that genocide.

Before 1967, it didn't fit into American strategic interests to talk about Jews or their history of oppression, particularly in the same sentence as the word "justice." After 1967, when Israel defeated Egypt, Syria, and Jordan, and conquered the West Bank, Gaza, East Jerusalem, Sinai and the Golan Heights, the US government decided that Israel could serve as a surrogate for US interests in the Middle East. 1967 was the year when the US discovered Israel, and it was the year when the Holocaust was "remembered." The discovery of Israel happened as selectively as the remembering of the Holocaust. The US discovered Israel as a military ally, not as a country with ordinary people, and so US aid to Israel reflected that. Most US aid to Israel, including economic aid, has been spent for expenses related to purchasing military equipment from the US. In order to justify that strategic relationship in moral terms, a new history of the Holocaust was "remembered."

One dominant narrative of the Holocaust is that Jews were led like sheep to the slaughter to the gas chambers, that they alone were murdered, and that the event of their annihilation had no precedent in history and no event in the present can compare to the Holocaust. The logical moral to the story for Jews is that we are alone in the world – no one understands our suffering because no one has experienced anything similar; we can only rely on ourselves for self-defense; we will be ever-vigilant, for danger lurks around every corner. And the logical moral to the story for Americans is that Jews need a strong Israel, and because the Jews were victims of the unspeakable, it's our duty to arm Israel to the teeth.

There are pieces of truth in the dominant narrative of the Holocaust. But it says very little about the hundreds of thousands of ordinary acts of resistance of those who perished, like the rabbi who, as he was shoved into the gas chamber, took the SS soldier by the lapel and said, "I will die today, but you will live alone with your guilt for a long time to come." Or the fact that the Jew who was forced to weld the sign at the entranceway to Auschwitz reading "Arbeit Macht Frei" (Work Makes Free) welded the "B" upside down, as a sign of rebellion and a testament of resistance. The dominant narrative says very little about the people who risked their lives and the lives of their families to save Jews and others who were targeted for deportation and annihilation. It says very little about the millions of Roma, Poles, homosexuals and disabled people who were systematically murdered. And it says very little about genocides that preceded it, like that of the Native Americans, or that of the Armenians. It's a cheap rendition of a much more complex story.

The result of the endless repetition of that dominant Holocaust narrative is that many Jews feel abandoned and isolated, and very, very angry. We walk into these monuments and museums, and we cry and scream. We walk out and feel empty. Somewhere inside of us, we get a creepy feeling that justice was never done. I think that we feel that way because no one is listening to what we went through. You ask, "How can you say that no one is listening when the US government has a special department specifically set up to memorialize the Holocaust? When the Holocaust Museum in Washington is the largest in the world? When documentaries about the Holocaust and films about the Holocaust receive public acclaim and Academy Awards?

Americans are listening to the story that they are being sold, one that serves the interests of a militant US foreign policy towards Israel. And that story isn't my story, and it isn't my family's story, or my family's friend's story. In my story, there is no moral to the story of the annihilation of six million Jews and the millions of Roma, Poles, homosexuals, disabled, and others who perished. Our story isn't one with the happy endings of Hollywood Holocaust blockbusters, where we all end up in Israel. The history of the Holocaust in my family isn't over yet. As a grandchild of four Holocaust survivors, I am still living that history. Even though the Holocaust or my family's experience of anti-Semitism was hardly mentioned, I grew up in a house with the ghosts of my murdered family, with parents and grandparents who lived in absolute fear.

After my family’s friend told me that she thought that Palestinians are vermin and that she would poison their wells if she could, she did the exact opposite with me and showered me with affection (and food). She’s an incredibly loving person who I believe would never intentionally hurt a single person. But she’s very angry. And her wrath is misdirected at people who had nothing to do with her suffering. Her wrath could have a comfortable resting place here in the United States, where the legacy of anti-Semitism has never been addressed in any kind of meaningful framework that doesn’t end in “and then they all lived happily-ever-after in Israel.” To say that we will be safe when Israel is armed to the teeth is a sacrilege and a lie. I don’t have any easy answers to the Holocaust. And anyone who does is trying to sell you something, like military equipment.

 


Jewish Peace News Editors:  Judith Norman Alistair Welchman Mitchell Plitnick Lincoln Shlensky Ami Kronfeld Rela Mazali Sarah Anne Minkin Joel Beinin Racheli Gai