Another Palestinian Candidate and a Powerful Jewish View of the Holocaust
November 30, 2004
Click here to let your friends know about JPN.
Jewish Voice for Peace needs your support. We are hard at work trying to expand our reach, to create JVP chapters around the country, to escalate our educational and media services like JPN and pushing forward with our Caterpillar Campaign. We can only do all of this with your help. Click here to donate now and help keep services like Jewish Peace News coming to you.
With the death of Yasir Arafat, there have been many articles about him. Click here for JVP's quick review of Arafat's life.
The views expressed here are those of the editors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Jewish Voice for Peace.
Today's Contents:
Reform candidate
enters PA race (BBC) Mustafa Barghouti
throws his hat in the ring
The Wrath of the
Jews (Znet) Liat Weingart on how Holocaust
manipulation hurts us all and promotes militarism
[JPN Commentary: Dr. Mustafa Barghouti,
founder and leader of al-Mubadara, the Palestinian National
Initiative has declared his candidacy for Palestinian president.
According to this BBC report, he is a distant second to Mahmoud Abbas (Abu
Mazen) in polls.
Barghouti should not be confused with Marwan Barghouti, who is currently
imprisoned in an Israeli jail. Marwan, who is extremely popular on the
Palestinian street, declared he would not run and threw his support behind
Abbas. This was a decisive factor in the widespread belief that Abbas will
easily win the election.
But Mustafa Barghouti is a long-time advocate for civil society within
the Palestinian territories and for clear negotiations with strong stances in
dealings with Israel. While many media outlets have, absurdly, described someone
like Mohammed Dahlan as a "reformer", Barghouti has been campaigning for real,
fundamental reforms and democratization of Palestinian government for years. He
does not have Abbas' experience in major leadership, or in the more violent
aspects that characterized the PLO in the 1970s. But he has been a voice of
moral clarity and political sensibility and has won the respect of many
Palestinians over the years.
While it seems that Abbas' election is a foregone conclusion, his actions
will be watched very closely by many. Today, for example he ordered, at Israel's
behest, Palestinian media to refrain from "incitement". This won't have a major
impact for most Palestinians as the edict deals only with state media, which is
not very popular among Palestinians who tend more toward the various foreign
Arab satellite stations. Still, although Israel has tried not to appear to
supportive of Abbas for fear of hurting his chances, gestures like this toward
Israel could hurt Abbas' standing in the eyes of many Palestinians who are
already somewhat skeptical of him.
While Barghouti is unlikely to win this election, he would do well to
keep growing his presence on the Palestinian political scene. The sort of
democratization that he advocates and the clear negotiating stances with Israel,
while maintaining a clear goal of ending the occupation, that he advocates are
very much what the Palestinian people need at this time. – MP]
Reform candidate enters PA race
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4052091.stm
Palestinian democracy and human rights activist Mustafa Barghouti has joined
the race to replace the late Yasser Arafat as Palestinian president.
Polls suggest that Mr Barghouti, 50, is in second place behind frontrunner
Mahmoud Abbas, who represents the ruling Fatah party.
"I will demand total reform, fight any form of corruption, mismanagement, and
consolidate the rule of law," he said.
Elections for the Palestinian Authority presidency are due on 9 January,
2005.
Mr Abbas, widely known as Abu Mazen, received a boost in his campaign when
the al-Aqsa Martyrs' Brigades - the armed wing of Fatah - announced it would
back his candidacy.
Another member of the Barghouti clan, Fatah leader in the West Bank Marwan
Barghouti - who has been jailed on terrorism charges by Israel - announced on
Friday he would not run in the presidential election and urged supporters to
back Mr Abbas.
'Historic moment'
Mustafa Barghouti, who will run as an independent, is the founder of the
reformist Palestinian National Initiative.
He said he wanted to make the fight against governmental corruption one of
the main platforms of his campaign.
His policies include creation of a Palestinian state with Jerusalem as its
capital, the right of return for refugees and the establishment of a democratic
political system.
He favours an immediate resumption of peace talks with Israel and peaceful
resistance to the Israeli occupation
"This is a historic moment in the life of the Palestinians, to prove to the
world that we deserve our status as an independent Palestinian people and a free
people in our independent state," Mr Barghouti said.
A poll by the State Information Service in Gaza indicated Mr Abbas had 41% of
the vote while Mr Barghouti had 20%.
'Not tough enough'
Mr Abbas was nominated to run as Fatah's only candidate at a Fatah
Revolutionary Council meeting in the West Bank city of Ramallah on Thursday.
The al-Aqsa Martyrs' Brigades - which are divided into several factions -
came together to issue the joint statement in support of Mr Abbas on Sunday.
Mr Abbas has been an outspoken opponent of the armed Palestinian uprising to
which the al-Aqsa Brigades have been totally committed - and some militants fear
that he will not be tough enough in negotiations with the Israelis, BBC
correspondent Alan Johnston says.
But the militants of al-Aqsa will watch Mr Abbas closely and if they were to
decide that he was giving too much away to the Israelis, he could face serious
opposition from the militants which might split the Fatah movement badly, our
correspondent says.
Mr Abbas served as prime minister in 2003 and has already replaced Arafat as
Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO) chairman.
Other possible independent candidates include political science professor
Abdel Sattar Qassem, journalist Majda al-Batch and billionaire businessman Munib
al-Masri.
The militant Islamic movements Hamas and Islamic Jihad are boycotting the
campaign because of their opposition to the creation of the Palestinian
Authority in the Oslo peace accords.
[JPN Commentary: In a hard-hitting commentary, Liat
Weingart, Co-Director of Jewish Voice for Peace, turns the cynical manipulation
of Holocaust history to serve militaristic ends on its head. Beginning with her
visceral reaction to a venomous expression of hatred toward Palestinians,
Weingart explores how the manipulation of Holocaust history not only serves to
support American policies that block hope for peace in Israel and Palestine, but
also denies the very real effects the Holocaust continues to have to this day on
Jews and other groups.
Weingart does us all a service by giving us a glimpse of how shallow the
common Holocaust narrative really is. She picks up on themes that were explored
in Peter Novick's excellent work, "The Holocaust in American Life" and applies
them to her real life experience.
The manipulation of the Holocaust has led many to try to approach the
current Jewish community and the conflict between Israel and the Palestinians by
trying to remove the Holocaust from the discussion. Weingart demonstrates that a
better way might well be to supplant Holocaust manipulation with a truer
understanding of the Holocaust. Because if there is one thing the Holocaust
should have taught us all it is that attempting to secure your own people
through nothing but force and the oppression of others, as the Nazis did, brings
doom upon your own people, your victims and on generations to come in ways that
cannot be predicted. It's a lesson that ought to be applied today in the
Occupied Territories, Iraq, Haiti, Colombia, the Ivory Coast, Chechnya and many
other places around the world. – MP]
The Wrath of the Jews
by Liat Weingart
http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?SectionID=30&ItemID=6757
I'm in the living room of a family friend. The subject changes from yoga to
Israel-Palestine, and I tell her that I think Americans need to change their
foreign policy towards Israel. She says, "in what way, so that the Arabs will
throw the Jews into the sea?" It takes four minutes of back and forth for the
conversation to degenerate. She finally says, "Look, what I have to say isn't
pretty, but I'm not afraid. I'm going to say it anyways. The Palestinians are
nothing but vermin. They make trouble in every country they live in. Even the
other Arab countries don't want them."
I take a deep breath. Then I realize, I've heard that sentence before, only
with "Jews" instead of "Palestinians." "Jews are vermin. They make trouble in
every country they live in." I've heard that before. And it's breaking my heart
that it's coming out of her mouth.
Earlier in the evening, we were sitting at dinner, and I asked her about why
she left Poland. She said that anti-Semitism in Poland was extremely severe when
she was growing up. She says that there was an outburst of anti-Semitism in the
mid-sixties, and especially after the June 1967 War. Her husband, also a Polish
Jew, looks up from his food and says abruptly, "Hey, why are you talking about
this? Please change the subject."
At dinner, everyone is more than willing to oblige with their Israeli army
stories, about how the Arabs want to throw the Jews in to the sea, but no one
wants to go there when it comes to talking about how they were hurt by
anti-Semitism. My mother has told me only a few stories of what it was like for
her to grow up as a Jew in the Soviet Union. The most famous is how she took a
broom to the head of a guy in school who persistently called her a "dirty Jew."
It's the story with a happy ending. Justice was done. Less discussed is the
story about how her father, a man who smuggled Jews out of the USSR and into
Israel, was arrested by the KGB and sent to prison for eight years. Or how she
was taken out of class every day for years and interrogated about her parents'
"political activity."
There's a lot of crying and screaming to do. And there ain't a whole lot of
room for it. Despite the enormity of the Holocaust Museum in Washington and
various monuments to the Holocaust in the US, when you really get down to it,
listening to Jews cry about how their families were annihilated, how they were
beaten and targeted, is not a favorite American past-time. Neither, for that
matter, is it terribly exciting for white folks to listen to Blacks cry about
the legacy of slavery, economic exploitation, and racism. Or for straight people
to listen to GLBTQT folks cry about what it feels like to have to lie about your
identity to survive, to live in existential terror.
The Holocaust Museum in Washington is the largest in the world and in the
center of Washington, DC. Many of us think that Americans have heard more than
enough about Jewish suffering. But the truth is that the Holocaust Museum and
other forms of official recognition of Jewish suffering haven't addressed
anti-Jewish oppression at all. It's hardly accidental. After all, though the
United States was created through the genocide of Native Americans, there is no
museum to commemorate their genocide in the center of our nation's capitol,
built on a federal land grant. The reason is simple – justice for Native
Americans runs counter to the interests of the American ruling elite, whose
wealth and power is built upon the legacy of that genocide.
Before 1967, it didn't fit into American strategic interests to talk about
Jews or their history of oppression, particularly in the same sentence as the
word "justice." After 1967, when Israel defeated Egypt, Syria, and Jordan, and
conquered the West Bank, Gaza, East Jerusalem, Sinai and the Golan Heights, the
US government decided that Israel could serve as a surrogate for US interests in
the Middle East. 1967 was the year when the US discovered Israel, and it was the
year when the Holocaust was "remembered." The discovery of Israel happened as
selectively as the remembering of the Holocaust. The US discovered Israel as a
military ally, not as a country with ordinary people, and so US aid to Israel
reflected that. Most US aid to Israel, including economic aid, has been spent
for expenses related to purchasing military equipment from the US. In order to
justify that strategic relationship in moral terms, a new history of the
Holocaust was "remembered."
One dominant narrative of the Holocaust is that Jews were led like sheep to
the slaughter to the gas chambers, that they alone were murdered, and that the
event of their annihilation had no precedent in history and no event in the
present can compare to the Holocaust. The logical moral to the story for Jews is
that we are alone in the world – no one understands our suffering because no one
has experienced anything similar; we can only rely on ourselves for
self-defense; we will be ever-vigilant, for danger lurks around every corner.
And the logical moral to the story for Americans is that Jews need a strong
Israel, and because the Jews were victims of the unspeakable, it's our duty to
arm Israel to the teeth.
There are pieces of truth in the dominant narrative of the Holocaust. But it
says very little about the hundreds of thousands of ordinary acts of resistance
of those who perished, like the rabbi who, as he was shoved into the gas
chamber, took the SS soldier by the lapel and said, "I will die today, but you
will live alone with your guilt for a long time to come." Or the fact that the
Jew who was forced to weld the sign at the entranceway to Auschwitz reading
"Arbeit Macht Frei" (Work Makes Free) welded the "B" upside down, as a sign of
rebellion and a testament of resistance. The dominant narrative says very little
about the people who risked their lives and the lives of their families to save
Jews and others who were targeted for deportation and annihilation. It says very
little about the millions of Roma, Poles, homosexuals and disabled people who
were systematically murdered. And it says very little about genocides that
preceded it, like that of the Native Americans, or that of the Armenians. It's a
cheap rendition of a much more complex story.
The result of the endless repetition of that dominant Holocaust narrative is
that many Jews feel abandoned and isolated, and very, very angry. We walk into
these monuments and museums, and we cry and scream. We walk out and feel empty.
Somewhere inside of us, we get a creepy feeling that justice was never done. I
think that we feel that way because no one is listening to what we went through.
You ask, "How can you say that no one is listening when the US government has a
special department specifically set up to memorialize the Holocaust? When the
Holocaust Museum in Washington is the largest in the world? When documentaries
about the Holocaust and films about the Holocaust receive public acclaim and
Academy Awards?
Americans are listening to the story that they are being sold, one that
serves the interests of a militant US foreign policy towards Israel. And that
story isn't my story, and it isn't my family's story, or my family's friend's
story. In my story, there is no moral to the story of the annihilation of six
million Jews and the millions of Roma, Poles, homosexuals, disabled, and others
who perished. Our story isn't one with the happy endings of Hollywood Holocaust
blockbusters, where we all end up in Israel. The history of the Holocaust in my
family isn't over yet. As a grandchild of four Holocaust survivors, I am still
living that history. Even though the Holocaust or my family's experience of
anti-Semitism was hardly mentioned, I grew up in a house with the ghosts of my
murdered family, with parents and grandparents who lived in absolute fear.
After my family’s friend told me
that she thought that Palestinians are vermin and that she would poison their
wells if she could, she did the exact opposite with me and showered me with
affection (and food). She’s an incredibly loving person who I believe would
never intentionally hurt a single person. But she’s very angry. And her wrath is
misdirected at people who had nothing to do with her suffering. Her wrath could
have a comfortable resting place here in the United States, where the legacy of
anti-Semitism has never been addressed in any kind of meaningful framework that
doesn’t end in “and then they all lived happily-ever-after in Israel.” To say
that we will be safe when Israel is armed to the teeth is a sacrilege and a lie.
I don’t have any easy answers to the Holocaust. And anyone who does is trying to
sell you something, like military equipment.
Jewish Peace News Editors: Judith Norman Alistair Welchman Mitchell Plitnick Lincoln Shlensky Ami Kronfeld Rela Mazali Sarah Anne Minkin Joel Beinin Racheli Gai